The Programmatic Acquisition Playbook: Turning Product Catalogs into Revenue Machines
An honest conversation about systematic PPC strategies, who they’re really for, and why most people get them wrong
“Most marketplaces bid on ‘templates’ and wonder why CAC is high. Meanwhile, ‘minimal SaaS Framer template for startups 2024’ has zero competition and converts at 4x the rate.”
Is programmatic acquisition right for every business? This approach makes
sense for marketplaces with hundreds of products, national companies with many
locations, content publishers, voucher sites, or established affiliates—not
for local businesses with 10 products or fewer.
Let me save you time if you’re the wrong fit.“People think programmatic acquisition is a one-size-fits-all solution,” I tell clients. “Technically, yes, the system works the same for three variants as it does for a thousand. But that’s like taking a nuke to a knife fight. It’s overkill.”This approach makes sense if you’re:
A marketplace or directory with hundreds of products across multiple categories
A national company with locations in every major city (think hundreds of location × service combinations)
A content publisher like Motley Fool pumping out monetized articles daily and needing to buy traffic at scale
A voucher or deals publisher managing thousands of brand relationships
An established affiliate ready to systematize beyond manual campaigns
If you’re a local plumber with three service areas, close this tab. Got 10 products total? Traditional PPC will serve you better.
“With 50 products and 10 modifiers—that’s 500 combinations—absolutely, go for it. But understand what you’re buying: a system. It’s an investment upfront, then you’re off to the races.”
What’s the key mindset change for programmatic acquisition? Shift from
“What keywords should I bid on?” to “What problems can I solve for customers
at different points in their journey?”—applying traditional product thinking
to acquisition strategy.
Forget everything you think you know about PPC.“Most people start by thinking, ‘What keywords should I bid on?’” Wrong question entirely.The programmatic mindset requires a different frame. I ask clients to imagine this: “What if you had unlimited budget, unlimited time, and an unlimited team that could implement things immediately? What would you do differently?”But even that’s not quite right. The real shift happens when you flip it entirely:
“Start with the end goal. You want as many people as possible to click your affiliate link, buy your stuff, whatever. Work backwards from there. What is the customer doing? At what point? What problems can you solve? It’s traditional product thinking applied to acquisition.”
Every combination of product attributes is a human with their credit card out, searching for something specific.
What makes programmatic acquisition effective? It systematically targets
long-tail keywords with lower competition and higher conversion rates, like
“minimal SaaS Framer template for startups 2024” instead of competing on
generic terms like “templates.”
After building and exiting Vouchernaut—which Groupon acquired after we dominated UK voucher PPC—I’ve applied this playbook multiple times. Each time, the same realization hits.“The holy shit moment isn’t one moment,” I explain. “It’s when you do the cost exercise. What would it take to hire someone in-house to do this manually? Even with spreadsheets and tools, it’s insane. Then you tick a few boxes, and off the revenue machine goes to print money.”Here’s what programmatic acquisition really means:
Picture a typical marketplace marketing team. They sit in a meeting room, brainstorm 20-30 keywords, set up campaigns, and call it a day. They bid on “templates” alongside everyone else, pay $2.50 per click, and wonder why CAC is astronomical.Meanwhile, someone searching for “minimal SaaS Framer template for startups 2024” can’t find what they want. Credit card out, ready to buy. Nobody’s bidding on it.
“The math is simple. Lower cost, higher conversion, less competition. But executing at scale? That requires systematic thinking.”
The Toolzilla Experiment: Lessons from the Trenches
What did the Toolzilla experiment teach about modern programmatic
strategies? Key lessons included building self-healing scrapers using AI,
discovering that direct-linking to marketplaces tripled conversions, and
learning that affiliate success requires platform relationships, not just
automation.
To validate these strategies with modern AI tools, I built Toolzilla—aggregating design assets from 50+ platforms. Not to brag about revenue (the test numbers were solid but that’s not the point), but to learn what works in 2024.
The biggest challenge wasn’t building scrapers—any developer can do that. It was maintaining them.“When you’re scraping 50 sites, something breaks daily. I spent entire weekends just fixing broken scrapers, watching my aggregation engine slowly fall apart.”The solution came from applying programmatic thinking to the problem itself. Instead of fixing scrapers manually, I built scrapers that fixed themselves:
Scraper fails
System detects the failure pattern
LLM analyzes the new page structure
Rewrites extraction code automatically
Tests and deploys if successful
This handled 80% of maintenance automatically. Not perfect, but it turned a full-time job into a weekly check-in.
The Direct-Link Discovery That Tripled Conversions
This is where it gets good.
“I always ask: instead of solving problems, how can we skip them? How can we bypass them entirely? Sometimes the best growth tactic is to not do anything and let the problem solve itself.”
I’d built this beautiful search interface with TypeSense, sub-100ms response times, perfect filtering. Then I had a thought: What if I skip my own website?
Traditional funnel: Ad → My site → Click → Marketplace → Maybe purchase
Direct funnel: Ad → Marketplace (with affiliate code) → Purchase
Conversions tripled overnight. The “landing page” became just a testing ground for finding winning combinations.
“You can’t force affiliate. You can’t force scaling. You have a relationship with partners at the end of the day.”Here’s what killed the momentum: Framer didn’t want Google as my primary acquisition source. I can respect that—they’re trying to build their own brand, and affiliate is a channel, not a business model.
“Go into this understanding: in affiliate, you can’t do whatever you want. You’re essentially a servant to the brand. But if you’re doing this for your own brand? You’re king. You get to do what you want.”
This one almost killed Vouchernaut, and it’s crucial for anyone considering programmatic affiliate.“I started spending £200 a month, then quickly scaled to £5-10k. With a 90-day lag on payment, I was in over my head with costs. If I took my foot off the pedal, I wouldn’t have grown as fast. But keeping it down meant potential bankruptcy.”The lesson? Have a plan. Have funding. Or have patience. You can’t have none of the three.
“Nothing beats human connection. There are tricks to building trust programmatically—you can read the Vouchernaut case study for those—but if you don’t have that connection, you’re going to be seen as a problematic affiliate.”
Being able to jump on UK calls during UK hours, talking strategy, positioning yourself as a partner rather than a parasite—that matters more than perfect automation.
How do you model realistic programmatic acquisition returns? Factor in
setup costs, cash flow gaps (often 90 days for affiliate payments), platform
fees, and relationship building time—the calculator shows potential, but
success requires surviving the investment period.
Before you get excited about 30x returns, model your actual situation. This calculator factors in the realities of cash flow, setup costs, and platform fees:
A Reality Check on the CalculatorThose numbers look amazing, right? Remember: this assumes you’ve already built the system, negotiated rates, established trust with platforms, and survived the cash flow gap. Budget accordingly.
What are the core phases of programmatic acquisition implementation? The
process involves understanding your inventory through data analysis, building
scalable campaign architecture with single keyword ad groups, and implementing
automation that matters while maintaining human oversight.
Let me walk you through how this actually works, using Toolzilla as the example.
Phase 1: Understanding Your Inventory Isn’t Optional
You can’t generate keywords for products you don’t understand. This isn’t about having a spreadsheet with SKUs. It’s about knowing every meaningful attribute that affects purchase intent.For Toolzilla, that meant:
Scraping 50+ platforms (most had no APIs)
Using LLMs to categorize based on visual and text analysis
Creating a unified taxonomy from chaos
“Every platform had different categories. What Framer called ‘landing pages,’ Webflow called ‘marketing sites.’ The LLM approach let me standardize without manual work.”
Forget everything you know about campaign structure. Programmatic requires discipline:
Copy
Campaign: Category_Intent_Modifier └── Ad Group: ONE keyword (SKAG) └── Ads: Dynamic insertion based on keyword └── Landing: Filtered to exact match
Why single keyword ad groups (SKAGs)? Because at scale, you need to know exactly what’s working. No guessing which keyword in a themed group drives performance.
What are some lesser-known programmatic acquisition tactics? Timing
opportunities like January “New Year, New Website” campaigns, using specific
inventory counts for credibility (“847 Templates” vs “Browse Templates”), and
optimizing quality scores before bid management.
Forget Black Friday. Everyone’s there. The real opportunities:“January is gold. ‘New Year, New Website’ isn’t just a cliché—it drives 3x normal conversion. March has ‘Spring Launch’ positioning. September gets ‘Fall Refresh.’ Same conversion rates as Black Friday, fraction of the competition.”
“A quality score of 8+ reduces CPC by 25%. But everyone obsesses over bid management instead of fixing their quality scores first.”The fix is usually simple: better keyword-to-ad-to-landing alignment. If someone searches for “minimal SaaS template,” your ad better mention “minimal SaaS template,” and your landing better show minimal SaaS templates. Sounds obvious. Most don’t do it.
When should you stop a programmatic acquisition project? Consider stopping
when maintenance overhead exceeds value creation, when platform relationships
become restrictive, or when the insights gained become more valuable applied
elsewhere than continuing the single project.
Not every experiment needs to become a business. With Toolzilla, I made a strategic decision that surprises people.“With those returns, why stop? The decision was strategic. The maintenance overhead of 50+ scrapers would require either hiring a team—turning it into a traditional business—or using expensive services that would kill margins.”The insights gained became more valuable applied to client projects than running a single aggregator. Sometimes the win is in the learning, not the running.
What’s the difference between agency and systematic approaches to
programmatic acquisition? Agencies often provide manual labor dressed as
expertise with ongoing retainers, while systematic approaches build the
infrastructure once for your team to use forever without monthly dependencies.
Here’s what happens when you hire a typical agency for this: They’ll be chomping at the bit to take your retainer. Why? Because they’ll just offset it to some junior doing data entry at scale. It’s manual work dressed up as expertise.
“Agencies love this because it’s recurring revenue for them. But they’re not building you a system—they’re selling you labor. Your marketing team ends up in 24/7 ads maintenance instead of working on strategy that actually moves the needle.”
We build the system once. Your team uses it forever. No monthly retainer for manual work. No junior data entry. Just a programmatic engine that runs while your team focuses on what matters.
What’s the key decision point for programmatic acquisition? The choice is
between continuing to pay for manual campaign management that doesn’t scale or
investing in a systematic approach that operates by different rules and
creates compound value over time.
Every marketplace leaves money on the table because they think in campaigns, not systems. They hire agencies to do manual work at scale instead of building the infrastructure once.The playbook works. We’ve proven it multiple times. The question is whether you want to keep paying for manual campaign management or invest in a system that scales.
“The difference between marketplaces that struggle and those that thrive isn’t budget—it’s methodology. Programmatic acquisition is that methodology. But only if you’re willing to think differently about the problem.”
What size business actually benefits from programmatic acquisition?
Programmatic acquisition makes sense for marketplaces with hundreds of products, national companies with many locations, content publishers, voucher sites, or established affiliates. If you have fewer than 50 products or you’re a local business with limited service areas, traditional PPC will serve you better. The system works for three variants as much as a thousand, but it’s overkill for small catalogs.
How do you shift from keyword-focused to problem-focused thinking?
Stop asking “What keywords should I bid on?” and start asking “What problems can I solve for customers at different points in their journey?” Apply traditional product thinking to acquisition. Every combination of product attributes represents a human with their credit card out, searching for something specific. Work backwards from the end goal of maximizing conversions.
Why does programmatic targeting work better than competing on generic terms?
Generic terms like “templates” have hundreds of competitors paying $2.50+ per click. Meanwhile, “minimal SaaS Framer template for startups 2024” has zero competition and converts at 4x the rate. The math is simple: lower cost, higher conversion, less competition. Programmatic systematically targets these long-tail opportunities at scale.
What was the biggest technical breakthrough in the Toolzilla experiment?
Building self-healing scrapers using AI. When scraping 50+ sites, something breaks daily. Instead of manual fixes, the system detects failure patterns, uses LLM to analyze new page structures, rewrites extraction code automatically, and deploys if successful. This handled 80% of maintenance automatically, turning a full-time job into weekly check-ins.
Why did direct-linking to marketplaces triple conversions?
Instead of the traditional funnel (Ad → My site → Click → Marketplace → Purchase), we went direct (Ad → Marketplace with affiliate code → Purchase). Skipping the intermediary landing page eliminated friction and decision fatigue. Sometimes the best growth tactic is to not solve problems but bypass them entirely.
What's the 90-day cash flow trap and how do you avoid it?
Most affiliate programs pay commissions 90 days after transactions. If you scale spending from £200 to significant monthly amounts, you’re funding three months of ad spend before seeing returns. This cash flow gap killed momentum at Vouchernaut and nearly caused bankruptcy. Have a plan: funding, patience, or both. You can’t have neither.
How do you model realistic returns versus unrealistic projections?
Factor in setup costs, 90-day cash flow gaps, platform fees, relationship building time, and maintenance overhead. The calculator shows potential, but success requires surviving the investment period. Budget for the reality that you’re building system infrastructure first, then seeing returns second.
What's the difference between agency and systematic approaches?
Agencies sell you manual labor dressed as expertise with ongoing retainers. They offset work to juniors doing data entry at scale. Systematic approaches build the infrastructure once for your team to use forever. No monthly dependency on manual work, no junior data entry, just a programmatic engine that runs while your team focuses on strategy.
How do you know if you should attempt programmatic acquisition?
Don’t bother if you have fewer than 50 products (math doesn’t work), margins can’t handle 20-30% CAC, you need profit in month one (takes 90 days minimum), or you think this is set-and-forget (it’s not). You need sufficient inventory, healthy margins, patience, and commitment to systematic maintenance.
What's the key decision point for implementing this approach?
The choice is between continuing to pay for manual campaign management that doesn’t scale or investing in a systematic approach that operates by different rules and creates compound value over time. Programmatic acquisition is methodology, not magic. But only if you’re willing to think differently about the problem.